|
Nickel Sensitization From
Ear Piercing |
Department Of Dermatology
Gentofte Hospital, Denmark
A. Boss and T. Menne
The main cause of nickel sensitization
at the present time is ear piercing. In the San Francisco area,
11 % of females in the age group less than 24 years of age are
nickel sensitized. Most frequently the sensitization was correlated
with piercing of the ears. The present study evaluates the nickel
sensitization rate in young females who have had their ears pierced.
The investigation was performed
in a school for hairdressers. The girls were aged between 16
and 22 years. At the time of the investigation, none had done
any practical work as part of their training. Among the 107 pupils
98 had their ears pierced with a mean of 2.5 (range 1-7) holes
per pupil. In 75% of the cases, the holes were made by a jeweler.
The rest were made by friends, hairdressers or the pupils themselves.
In no instances did a doctor make them. The initial reaction
after the holes were made disappeared after 4 days in 45% of
the cases. The healing time ranged from 2 days to 8 months. Seventy-one
of the 107 reported either oozing or dermatitis when costume
jewelry was used in the ears. The number of complaints was independent
of the healing time, as well as the number of holes.
Among the 53 patch tested, 32 had had some reaction to costume
jewelry. The other 11 did not have any trouble either at the
time of ear piercing or subsequently. Among the 53 patch tested,
11 had a positive reaction to nickel and 1 to cobalt. All the
positive reactions were found among those with previous oozing
or dermatitis of the ear lobes.
A use test with the implicated
jewelry was made on 13 pupils, 5 with a positive nickel patch
test and 8 with a negative test. All had experienced trouble
with some earrings. They were asked to wear the earrings for
48 hours. In the 5 with a positive patch test, all had an eczematous
reaction from the earrings. Seven of the 8 with a negative nickel
patch test had a similar eczematous reaction when exposed to
earrings.
COMMENTS
The manner of ear piercing today
and the use of nickel-plated jewelry results in a nickel sensitization
rate of a minimum of 20% among young females. Most costume jewelry
is made up of a nickel alloy.
The outcome of the use test was
surprising. Those with an unexpected positive use test may be
nickel sensitive, having a false negative patch test. Another
possibility is that the reaction is caused by local sensitivity,
or may be due to irritation or infection.
All the girls investigated intend
to become hairdressers. Hand dermatitis in hairdressers is often
related to nickel allergy. It is possible that the nickel allergy
is not occupational at all, but due to sensitization from costume
jewelry. We intend to follow the sensitized girls to see whether
they develop hand dermatitis to a greater degree than those not
nickel sensitive.
Synopsis: Complete report available
upon request. |